New government plans to reform older people’s social care include suggestions to means-test Winter Fuel payments, or provide it only to those already receiving Pension Credit. This could see many pensioners losing out on benefits. Other suggestions include capping to the total amount individuals have to pay towards their social care over their lifetime. Find out more below.Remaining story taken from BBC News:

Winter fuel payments should be means-tested to help pay for care of the elderly, a former minister has said. A report by Lib Dem MP Paul Burstow said targeting the allowance would help pay for a fairer social care system. The report said it could fund most of the £1.7bn cost of implementing reforms of elderly care in England.

While David Cameron said universal benefits for pensioners would be protected the BBC understands ministers are poised to back a cap on care costs. Last year the Dilnot Commission recommended that the cap on the amount individuals have to pay towards their social care be set at £35,000 over a lifetime.

The commission, set up by the government, argued that such a move would protect people from catastrophic care costs that result in them having to sell their homes. At the time, ministers said a cap was the “right basis” for change but they needed to look at other cheaper options.

The BBC’s chief political correspondent Norman Smith said there were growing signs that a commitment to a cap could be included in the coalition’s mid-term review expected to be published shortly.

As things stand, older people in England have to pay for their care costs if they have assets of more than around £23,250. Similar systems exist in Wales and Northern Ireland, but in Scotland personal care is provided free.

Under the proposals from Mr Burstow and the Centre Forum, the cap on the amount people should pay towards social care costs would be set at £60,000 but the amount of assets people could hold would rise to £100,000. They said winter fuel allowance should be limited to those receiving pension credit.

Pension credit takes into account savings and income, and only the poorest retired people qualify to receive it.

The move would save £1.5bn a year and mean about three-quarters of current recipients would lose the allowance, which is worth between £200 and £300 per household, Mr Burstow’s report explains. The report also proposed ending the relief on capital gains tax at death. This would raise another £600m a year, it said.

Mr Burstow, the former care services minister, said: “Social care isn’t free, but it could be a lot fairer for those who have worked hard all their lives. “By concentrating the winter fuel payment on those eligible for pension credit, we can pay for a cap on care costs.”

He said there were 100,000 pensioners with incomes of more than £100,000 a year and questioned whether it was “right” to continue to pay them winter fuel allowance as many of them admitted to using the money for other things.

Michelle Mitchell, of Age UK, said introducing a cap on social care costs would “lift one of the great fears of becoming older”. But she urged caution over taking away other benefits from the elderly. “We appreciate that the country is facing difficult financial times, but we must be careful that the wider implications for older people of any potential source of funding are fully considered.”

The suggestion that winter fuel payments should be targeted comes amid rising controversy about the allowance and amid the continuing debate over how to pay for long-term care for the elderly. Any commitment to a cap would be significant, Norman Smith added, as previous governments had shied away from such a move due to the huge cost implications involved. However, he said no details of the level at which a cap would be set, how it would be paid for and when it would come into effect were likely to be given.

Earlier on Thursday, Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said the UK had a “long way to go” if it was to be regarded as one of the best places in Europe to grow old. “There is no doubt capping costs – the principle recommended by Dilnot – is the best model. The key question is how to fund it sensibly given the current deficit. We are looking at how to achieve this, along with taking action to ensure people do not have to sell their homes to pay for care.”